Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Search representations

Results for Mrs Louise Jordan search

New search New search

Object

Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Q31: Please set out any changes that you think should be made to the principles & guidance for the preparation of ‘Design Codes’. 

Representation ID: 548

Received: 14/12/2025

Respondent: Mrs Louise Jordan

Representation Summary:

Irrelevant question based on previous responses


Our response:

Objection noted.

Object

Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Q32: Do you agree with the principles & guidance for ‘Long Term Stewardship’?

Representation ID: 549

Received: 14/12/2025

Respondent: Mrs Louise Jordan

Representation Summary:

Irrelevant question based on previous responses


Our response:

Objection noted

Object

Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Q33: Please set out any changes that you think should be made to the principles & guidance for ‘Long term Stewardship’.

Representation ID: 550

Received: 14/12/2025

Respondent: Mrs Louise Jordan

Representation Summary:

Irrelevant question based on previous responses


Our response:

Objection noted.

Object

Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Q34: Do you have any other comments on the Draft Supplementary Planning Document?

Representation ID: 551

Received: 14/12/2025

Respondent: Mrs Louise Jordan

Representation Summary:

The development should be abandoned and should never have got this far.


Our response:

Comment noted.
The overall strategy and policy basis for Heathlands was established by the Local Plan Review which was adopted by the Council in March 2024, following a robust process of debate and scrutiny via an independent ‘Examination in Public’.
The SPD takes forward the requirements of Policy LPRSP4(A) of the Local Plan Review which allocated the site and required the preparation of the SPD.

Object

Heathlands Garden Settlement SPD

Q35: Do you have any comments about how easy the document is to use and understand or what improvements could be made? 

Representation ID: 552

Received: 14/12/2025

Respondent: Mrs Louise Jordan

Representation Summary:

This document is far too long and doesn’t take into account a primary objection to the whole development. Which makes almost all of the other questions completely irrelevant.


Our response:

Comment noted.
The SPD takes forward the requirements of Policy LPRSP4(A) of the Local Plan Review which allocated the site and required the preparation of the SPD.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.