Volume 2: Sustainability Appraisal of the Maidstone Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Development Plan Document 2023–2040

Ends on 11 January 2026 (37 days remaining)

Appendix E: Assessment of Reasonable Alternative Sites (Post-mitigation)

E.1 Introduction

E.1.1 Overview

E.1.1.1 The process which has been used to appraise reasonable alternative sites is sequenced through two stages. Firstly, sites are assessed in terms of impacts on the baseline without consideration of mitigation. Secondly, the appraisal findings are further assessed in light of any relevant mitigation that is available through emerging Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople (GTTS) Development Plan Document (DPD) policies prepared by Maidstone Borough Council (MBC)1, or policies from the adopted Local Plan Review (LPR)2 which the GTTS DPD will sit alongside.

E.1.1.2 The pre-mitigation assessment provides a baseline assessment of each site and identifies any local constraints, but does not consider mitigating factors such as local plan policy. The purpose of this stage is to identify the impacts that will need to be overcome for development to optimise sustainability performance.

E.1.1.3 The post-mitigation assessment considers how mitigating factors, including emerging DPD policy and adopted LPR policy, will help to avoid or reduce the impacts that were identified at the pre-mitigation stage.

E.1.1.4 It is important to demonstrate the amount of mitigation that may be required to ensure a site can optimise sustainability performance. The level of intervention that may be required to facilitate effective mitigation varies and can help determine the eventual choice of preferred option in the plan. Sites which require low levels of intervention are likely to be preferable to sites that require complex and potentially unviable strategies.

E.1.1.5 Chapter E.2 sets out the pre-mitigation impacts of all reasonable alternative sites considered throughout the SA process, alongside the DPD preparation (see Appendix C for the full pre-mitigation site assessments set out per receptor within each SA Objective).

E.1.1.6 Chapter E.3 provides detail on the mitigation within the DPD and adopted LPR, and discusses the post-mitigation impacts for the reasonable alternative sites against each SA Objective where potential adverse effects were identified. This will be subject to change at the Regulation 19 stage when the policies and allocations are finalised.

E.1.1.7 Chapter E.4 summarises the overall post-mitigation assessment for the reasonable alternative sites, with scoring set out per SA Objective.

E.2 Pre-mitigation assessment

E.2.1 Introduction

E.2.1.1 A total of 158 reasonable alternative sites have been identified and described by MBC and evaluated in the SA process. The full pre-mitigation assessment of these sites is set out in Appendix C.

E.2.1.2 Table E.2.1 presents the summary pre-mitigation impact matrix for the reasonable alternative sites, summarising the assessment that is set out per receptor within each SA Objective in Appendix C.

Table E.2.1: Impact matrix table of the reasonable alternative sites, pre-mitigation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Site reference

Housing

Transport & accessibility

Community & crime

Health & wellbeing

Economy

Natural resources

Water

Air quality

Flooding

Climate change

Biodiversity

Cultural heritage

Landscape

0001

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

-

0002

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

0

0004

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

+

+/-

-

0

- -

0005

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0007

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

0

0008

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

-

-

0009

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

- -

+/-

+/-

-

-

0010

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

+/-

-

-

-

0017

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0018

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0020

+

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0021

+

-

-

-

+

0

-

0

+

+/-

- -

0

- -

0024

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

0

0026

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

-

0

0030

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0042

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0044

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

0

0045

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0046

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0047

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0048

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

-

0049

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0050

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0052

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0053

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

-

0

0055

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

-

0

0056

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

-

0

0

0057

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

-

0059

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

- -

+/-

-

0

-

0067

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0068

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

+/-

-

-

0069

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

-

+/-

- -

0

-

0197

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0199

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+/-

-

0

-

0201

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+/-

-

0

-

0202

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

-

+/-

+/-

0

-

0203

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0204

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0206

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

-

0208

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+/-

+/-

-

-

0209

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

-

+/-

-

0

-

0211

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

-

0

-

0213

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0214

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

-

0

0215

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

+/-

-

0

- -

0216

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

0

- -

0219

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0220

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

0

- -

0221

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

0

- -

0222

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

0

- -

0225

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0226

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0229

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+/-

-

0

-

0230

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0231

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0232

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

0

0233

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

0

0234

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0235

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

- -

-

- -

0236

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+/-

-

-

-

0238

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0244

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

- -

0245

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

- -

+/-

+/-

-

0

0248

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0249

+

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0250

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+/-

+/-

-

-

0251

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0252

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0253

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

0

+/-

+/-

0

-

0255

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

-

+/-

-

0

-

0256

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

0

0261

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

0

0264

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

0279

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0280

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0283

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0284

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0286

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0289

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

-

+/-

+/-

0

-

0290

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0291

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0292

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0293

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

0306

+

-

-

-

+

0

-

-

+

+/-

- -

-

- -

0307

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

-

-

0

0308

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0310

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

0

0321

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-001

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

- -

-

-

C4S-002

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

-

- -

+/-

+/-

0

-

C4S-003

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-004

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

C4S-005

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

C4S-008

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-011

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-012

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-015

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-017

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

-

-

C4S-019

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-021

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

-

-

C4S-022

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-025

++

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-028

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

0

-

C4S-029

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

0

-

C4S-030

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

+/-

-

0

-

LPR022

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

+/-

-

-

LPR023

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

+/-

-

-

LPR032

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

-

0

-

LPR256

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+/-

- -

-

- -

LPRGT1(5)

+

-

-

- -

+

-

+/-

-

+

+/-

-

-

-

LPRGT1(10)

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+/-

-

0

- -

E.3 Mitigating effects of the DPD policies

E.3.1 Introduction

E.3.1.1 Nine draft preferred policies are included within the Regulation 18c 'Preferred Policies and Potential Sites' version of the DPD. The policies have been evaluated in Appendix D, many of which are anticipated to improve the sustainability performance of the reasonable alternative site assessments through the reduction or elimination of adverse effects and optimising positive effects. Once adopted, the DPD will form part of the statutory development plan for Maidstone, sitting alongside the adopted LPR3. Policies set out in the adopted LPR will also apply to GTTS development within the borough, and as such, their mitigating provisions have also been considered in the post-mitigation assessment.

E.3.1.2 Tables E.3.1 to E.3.13 below set out the potential adverse impacts that have been identified through the assessment of sites pre-mitigation for each SA Objective (as explained in full within Appendix and summarised in Table E.2.1) and indicate which, if any, of the emerging DPD policies or adopted LPR policies will be likely to mitigate these effects.

E.3.1.3 The assessment of the sustainability performance of sites post-mitigation, taking into account the policy mitigation, is summarised in the matrix in Table E.4.1. It should be noted that the post-mitigation assessment will be subject to change at the Regulation 19 stage when the policies and allocations are finalised.

E.3.1.4 It should be noted that the requirements of the 28 site-specific allocation policies set out in the DPD (and appraised in Appendix F) have not informed the post-mitigation assessments as these do not relate to all reasonable alternative sites.

E.3.2 SA Objective 1 – Housing

E.3.2.1 No adverse effects have been identified against SA Objective 1 pre-mitigation, as all proposed reasonable alternative sites would contribute towards meeting the identified accommodation needs for GTTS communities.

E.3.3 SA Objective 2 – Transport and accessibility

E.3.3.1 Table E.3.1 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 2, and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.3.2 While the DPD and LPR policies that prioritise accessibility to public transport set out a positive approach which is likely to benefit some GTTS residents, these policies alone may not fully mitigate the challenges posed by sites that are beyond recommended distances from sustainable transport infrastructure. Further incentives may be required to ensure that development of GTTS sites prioritise accessible locations and improve sustainable transport access in less accessible locations. Travel plans could be developed for sites in less well-connected areas.

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for transport and accessibility

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Access to public transport – the majority of GTTS sites are located in rural areas, beyond the recommended sustainable distance to bus stops offering a frequent service (400m) or railway stations (2km).

  • Policies TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) and TR7 (Accommodation on Non- allocated Sites)will ensure preference is given to sites that are accessible via public transport.
  • Policy LPRSP12 (Sustainable Transport) sets out a range of transport provisions including a new bus interchange, improved bus links to rural areas, and prioritisation of sustainable transport modes along radial routes.
  • Policy LPRSP3 (Edge of the Maidstone Urban Area) sets out the provision of a new bus loop.
  • Policy LPRSP4(A) (Heathlands Garden Settlement) outlines a potential new railway station along the Maidstone- Ashford line that could improve rail access across the area.

The policies will be expected to improve access to sustainable transport options, particularly around the main settlements. However, the nature and location of many GTTS sites in rural areas means it is unlikely that restricted access to public transport infrastructure will be fully mitigated in all locations.

Access to pedestrian / cycle routes – the majority of GTTS sites are not connected to the existing pedestrian or cycle networks, meaning other less sustainable modes of transport are likely to be preferable over active travel.

  • Policies TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) and TR7 (Accommodation on Non- allocated Sites) will ensure preference is given to sites that are accessible via foot or cycle.
  • Policy LPRSP12 (Sustainable Transport) sets out a range of transport provisions including walking and cycling improvements and enhanced public rights of way (PRoW).

While the policies will improve the coverage of walking and cycling routes, and give preference to GTTS sites that are accessible, it is unlikely that limited pedestrian/cycle access will be mitigated in all locations.

Access to food stores – the majority of GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended sustainable distance of 800m to a food store.

  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure preference is given to sites that are close to settlements and communities where a range of facilities are accessible, including shopping facilities.
  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including access to services and facilities (e.g., shops).
  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Travellerand Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires local services including shops to be accessible from GTTS sites, preferably via sustainable modes of travel.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to ensure permeability is maximised with links to local services.

While the policies will improve the coverage of sustainable transport links to local services, and give preference to GTTS sites that are accessible, it is unlikely that limited sustainable access to food stores will be mitigated in all locations.

Access to education – the majority of GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended maximum sustainable distance to primary schools (1km) and secondary schools (2km). Sites located at greater distances may be reliant on private vehicles for travel to school, or discourage attendance at school, further education or training.

  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure preference is given to sites that are close to settlements and communities where a range of facilities are accessible, including schools.
  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocatedSites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including access to services and facilities (e.g., education).
  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Travellerand Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires local services including schools to be accessible from GTTS sites, preferably via sustainable modes of travel.
  • Policy LPRSP13 (Infrastructure Delivery) sets out a range of infrastructure priorities including new educational facilities.

While the policies will improve the coverage of sustainable transport links to schools, and give preference to GTTS sites that are accessible, it is unlikely that limited sustainable access to education will be mitigated in all locations.

E.3.4 SA Objective 3 – Community and crime

E.3.4.1 Table E.3.2 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 3 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.4.2 The reasonable alternative GTTS sites are distributed in various settlements and locations around Maidstone Borough, where despite the positive intentions of DPD and LPR policies there is potential for some sites to remain isolated from settled communities and the facilities they provide. Adopted LPR policies are however likely to ensure that GTTS development in deprived areas is sensitively designed and reduces the likelihood of adverse effects on the community and crime.

Table E.3.2: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA3 – Community and crime

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for community and crime

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Proximity to district and local centres – the majority of GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended sustainable distance from district or local centres, which has potential to increase difficulties for GTTS residents to integrate with the settled community.

  • DPD Policy TR1 (Spatial Strategy) promotes development within existing urban areas, rural service centres and new garden settlements.
  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure preference is given to sites that are close to settlements and communities where a range of facilities are accessible.
  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including location within the community and promoting integrated co-existence with settled communities.

While the policies direct a proportion of development towards existing settlements where opportunities for integration with settled communities are likely to be greater, some GTTS sites lie in rural areas where adverse effects associated with isolation may occur.

The DPD does however seek to provide a range of sites that may enable more choice for GTTS communities in their preferred location with respect to settled communities.

Deprivation – approximately half of the GTTS sites lie within LSOAs which fall within the 10-50% most deprived areas, where development has potential to exacerbate inequalities, increase fear of crime and pressure on local services.

  • Policy LPRSP2 (Maidstone Urban Area) supports development that will improve the health, social, environmental, and employment wellbeing of those living in deprived areas.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to ensure proposals create a safe and secure environment with features to deter crime, fear of crime, disorder, and anti- social behaviour.
  • Policy LPRSP13 (Infrastructure Delivery) sets out a range of infrastructure priorities including new community facilities which may help to alleviate some pressures on infrastructure capacity.

The LPR policies set out strong guidance to ensure that development addresses inequalities and is designed to be safe and reduce crime / the fear of crime.

E.3.5 SA Objective 4 – Health and wellbeing

E.3.5.1 Table E.3.3 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 4 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.5.2 No adverse effects have been identified in terms of access to PRoW/cycle network, as all proposed reasonable alternative sites are located within the recommended distance to these routes. However, many reasonable alternative GTTS sites lie beyond the recommended distance to other health and wellbeing receptors. Overall, while the DPD and LPR policies that prioritise accessibility to public transport set out a positive approach which is likely to benefit some GTTS residents, these policies alone may not fully mitigate the challenges posed by sites that are beyond recommended distances to healthcare and leisure facilities.

Table E.3.3: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA4 – Health and wellbeing

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for health and wellbeing

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Access to healthcare – the majority of GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended sustainable distance to GP surgeries and NHS hospitals with an A&E department, potentially introducing barriers to accessing essential healthcare services and exacerbating health inequalities.
  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure preference is given to sites that are close to settlements and communities where a range of facilities are accessible, including healthcare.
  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including access to services and facilities (e.g., healthcare).
  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires local services including healthcare to be accessible from GTTS sites, preferably via sustainable modes of travel.
  • Policy LPRSP13 (Infrastructure Delivery) sets out a range of infrastructure priorities including new health facilities, and various other LPR policies outline extensions or improvements to existing healthcare centres.
While the policies will improve the coverage of sustainable transport links to healthcare facilities, and give preference to GTTS sites that are accessible, it is unlikely that limited sustainable access to healthcare will be mitigated in all locations.

Access to leisure facilities – all GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended sustainable distance to leisure facilities, with potential implications for social exclusion and limited recreational opportunities.

  • Policy LPRCD1 (Shops, Facilities and Services) supports proposals for leisure development in Maidstone, and various other LPR policies set out the provision of new sports facilities.

The LPR policies will provide new leisure facilities and improve the coverage of sustainable transport links across the borough.

However, it is unlikely that limited sustainable access to leisure facilities will be mitigated in all locations.

Access to open / green spaces – the majority of GTTS sites are located beyond the recommended sustainable distance to open / green space for recreation and leisure, potentially limiting opportunities for outdoor exercise and recreation. Two sites (0084 and LPRGT1(5)) partially coincide with green space.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will encourage sites of 10 or more pitches to provide communal children's play space.
  • Policy LPRINF1 (Publicly Accessibly Open Space and Recreation)sets out standards for the quantity and quality of publicly accessible open spaces to be provided either on-site or off-site within specified distances.
  • Policy LPRSP13 (Infrastructure Delivery) sets out a range of infrastructure priorities including new open space.
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to contribute to improved accessibility of natural green space within walking distance.
  • Various area-based LPR policies seek to resist the loss of local facilities including green spaces.

The policies will be expected to ensure that GTTS residents will have improved levels of access to some form of communal open space.

E.3.6 SA Objective 5 – Economy

E.3.6.1 No adverse effects have been identified against SA Objective 5 pre-mitigation, as all proposed reasonable alternative sites are located within the 5km sustainable target distance to an economic development area (EDA) or a local/district centre, which are expected to provide a range of employment and professional training opportunities.

E.3.7 SA Objective 6 – Natural resources

E.3.7.1 Table E.3.4 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 6 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.7.2 In terms of mineral resources, the framework of policies set out in the Kent Minerals and Waste Local Plan will be expected to ensure that any adverse effects on mineral resources as a result of GTTS development are identified and addressed. It is however unlikely that

impacts associated with the loss of soil resources and high-quality agricultural land can be fully mitigated by the DPD and LPR policies, despite promoting an efficient use of land. The DPD policies could be enhanced through introducing stronger reference to the need to avoid hardstanding development on areas of higher quality soil within the perimeter of GTTS sites, where these areas could instead be preserved for integrated green infrastructure or open spaces.

Table E.3.4: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA6 – Natural resources

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for natural resources

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Loss of mineral resources– approximately half of GTTS sites coincide with Mineral Safeguarding Areas (MSAs) where there is potential for sterilisation of mineral resources via the introduction of non- minerals development.

  • Proposals that fall within MSAs will be required to undertake a minerals assessment to assess the viability and practicability of prior extraction of minerals resource in accordance with Policy DM9 (Prior Extraction of Minerals in Advance of Surface Development) of the Kent Minerals and Waste Local Plan4.

Policies within the Minerals and Waste Plan will ensure that mineral resources are conserved and/or extracted where appropriate.

Loss of high-quality soils – the majority of GTTS sites contain previously undeveloped land of Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Grade 1, 2 or 3 which may include 'best and most versatile' (BMV) agricultural land.

  • DPD Policy TR1 (Spatial Strategy) encourages an efficient use of land via redevelopment, infilling and use of previously developed land (PDL) in Maidstone's settlements.
  • Policy LPRHOU1 (Development on Brownfield Land) promotes an efficient use of land.

Whilst the policies give preference to development on PDL and promote an efficient use of land, it is likely that some small-scale losses of undeveloped land, including some high-quality soils, will remain that could cumulatively be significant.

E.3.8 SA Objective 7 – Water

E.3.8.1 Table E.3.5 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 7 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.8.2 The DPD and LPR policies set out positive strategies to protect the quality of above and below ground waterbodies and promote an efficient use of water resources. However, in line with Environment Agency advice, it is recommended that every effort should be made to connect GTTS sites to the mains sewer network and to avoid discharges to ground in areas of high groundwater value and vulnerability. Further detail regarding the sewerage infrastructure and wastewater drainage requirements for GTTS sites will be needed to confirm whether adverse effects can be wholly mitigated.

Table E.3.5: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA7 – Water

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for water

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Watercourse quality – new development has potential to result in downstream impacts on water quality owing to increased runoff, especially for the proportion of GTTS sites in close proximity to watercourses.

  • DPD PolicyTR8 (General Site Design and Layout) requires development proposals for GTTS sites to provide details of wastewater infrastructure and incorporation of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) where possible.
  • DPD Policy TR9 (Dayrooms and Amenity Blocks) cross-references to water efficiency measures required by Policy LPRQD1 (Sustainable Design) including BREEAM 'Very Good' rating.
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to control pollution to protect water quality and mitigate against the deterioration of water bodies.

While the DPD and LPR policies seek to identify and reduce water pollution impacts, there remains potential for adverse effects associated with runoff from new and expanded GTTS sites, in absence of site- specific details to confirm that drainage solutions and mitigation will be effective.

Groundwater SPZ – a small number of GTTS sites lie within Source Protection Zones (SPZs) where there is increased potential for contamination of groundwater.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) requires development proposals for GTTS sites to provide details of wastewater infrastructure and incorporation of SuDS where possible.
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to control pollution to protect groundwater quality and mitigate against adverse impacts on groundwater SPZs and principal aquifers.

The LPR policies will help to ensure that potential adverse impacts on groundwater quality are identified and addressed. However, the DPD policies do not specify requirements to protect groundwater quality and confirm that non-mains drainage connections will be avoided. Adverse effects cannot be ruled out at this stage.

E.3.9 SA Objective 8 – Air quality

E.3.9.1 Table E.3.6 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 8, and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.9.2 No adverse effects have been identified in terms of proximity to Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) and associated poor air quality, as none of the proposed reasonable alternative sites are located within 200m of an AQMA. A small proportion of reasonable alternative GTTS sites do however lie within 200m of a main road or railway line where there is potential for adverse effects associated with exposure to higher levels of air and noise pollution and vibrations. It is likely that the DPD and LPR policies will ensure that significant adverse effects in this regard will be avoided or minimised.

Table E.3.6: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA8 – Air quality

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for air quality

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Exposure to air pollution associated with main roads – a small number of GTTS sites are located within 200m of a main road where residents are more likely to be exposed to higher levels of air pollution associated with road transport.

  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including for living environments, to ensure that noise and air quality implications on the health of occupants from surrounding land uses are considered.
  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) includes requirements for boundary landscaping to screen developments which may indirectly help to reduce exposure to pollution from adjacent roads.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to ensure proposals do not result in, or its occupants are exposed to, excessive air pollution.
  • Policy LPRTRA1 (Air Quality) and other transport-focused LPR policies will help to protect and improve air quality, ensuring that relevant proposals submit an Air Quality Impact Assessment.

The policies will help to minimise adverse impacts associated with the exposure of site end users to poor air quality associated with main roads.

Exposure to air/noise pollution and vibrations associated with railways – a small number of GTTS sites are located within 200m of a railway line where air/noise pollution and disturbance is likely to be higher.

  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including for living environments, to ensure that noise and air quality implications on the health of occupants from surrounding land uses are considered.
  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) includes requirements for boundary landscaping to screen developments which may indirectly help to reduce exposure to pollution from adjacent railway lines.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to ensure proposals do not result in, or its occupants are exposed to, excessive noise, vibration or air pollution.

The policies will help to minimise adverse impacts associated with the exposure of site end users noise pollution and disturbance associated with railway lines.

E.3.10 SA Objective 9 – Flooding

E.3.10.1 Table E.3.7 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 9 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.10.2 Caravan sites are highly vulnerable to flooding. While the DPD and LPR policies will ensure that preference is given to areas at low risk of flooding, in accordance with national policy, some reasonable alternative GTTS sites lie where the entirety or majority of the site is within Flood Zone 2 and/or 3. It is recommended that the Environment Agency is consulted to confirm any potential for adverse effects beyond those identified in the SA, or any requirement for further flood risk assessments to determine need for site-specific mitigation and whether proposals might be acceptable.

Table E.3.7: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA9 – Flooding

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for flooding

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Fluvial flood risk – a small number of GTTS sites are located wholly or partially within Flood Zones 2 and/or 3 where residents will be exposed to higher levels of flood risk, and development may exacerbate existing flood risk on site or downstream.

  • DPD Policy TR1 (Spatial Strategy) recognises the requirement to apply the Sequential Test and Exception Test where necessary.
  • DPD Policy TR7 (Accommodation on Non-allocated Sites) sets out criteria for non-allocated sites, including for flood risk, to ensure that GTTS sites are directed away from Flood Zone 3a and 3b, and subject to site-specific flood risk assessments where necessary.
  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires GTTS development to avoid areas at risk of flooding (Zones 3a and 3b).
  • Policy LPRSP14(C) (Climate Change) sets out a range of measures to ensure that development in the borough mitigates and adapts to climate change including a requirement for Flood Risk Assessments for development in Flood Zone 2 or 3, or sites over 1ha.

The DPD and LPR policies will ensure that GTTS sites are directed away from the highest risk of fluvial flooding and that Flood Risk Assessments are carried out where required. However, Sites 0125 and 0245 lie wholly within Flood Zone 2 and/or 3 where it is unlikely that mitigation will be possible.

At this stage of the assessment process, in absence of Sequential Test / Exception Test information, it is unknown whether adverse effects can be fully mitigated or if any site-specific flood risk assessments will be required.

Surface water flood risk – a small number of GTTS sites coincide with areas of SWFR where residents will be exposed to higher levels of flood risk, and development may exacerbate existing flood risk on site or in surrounding areas.

  • DPD Policy TR1 (Spatial Strategy) recognises the requirement to apply the Sequential Test and Exception Test where necessary.
  • DPD PolicyTR8 (General Site Design and Layout) requires development proposals for GTTS sites to provide details of surface water drainage incorporating SuDS where possible.
  • Policy LPRSP14(C) (Climate Change) sets out a range of measures to ensure that development in the borough mitigates and adapts to climate change, including regard to surface water management plans.

The policies seek to address potential adverse impacts associated with development in areas at risk of surface water flooding.

At this stage of the assessment process, in absence of Sequential Test / Exception Test information, it is unknown whether adverse effects can be fully mitigated or if any site-specific flood risk assessments will be required.

E.3.11 SA Objective 10 – Climate change

E.3.11.1 Table E.3.8 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 10 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.11.2 Whilst some uncertainty remains in terms of the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions likely to be associated with GTTS development sites, the DPD and LPR policy requirements will be expected to ensure that renewable and low-carbon energy sources are drawn upon where possible and that sites are resilient to climate change.

Table E.3.8: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA10 – Climate change

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for climate change

Commentary:Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Opportunities for renewable/low-carbon energy use – in absence of site-specific data, there is potential for adverse or positive effects with regard to GHG emissions and opportunities for GTTS development to draw on renewable or low-carbon energy sources.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) requires development proposals for GTTS sites to incorporate at least 10% on-site renewable or low carbon energy production measured as a percentage of overall consumption.
  • DPD Policy TR9 (Dayrooms and Amenity Blocks) cross-references to the requirements of Policy LPRQD1 (Sustainable Design) that will ensure a 'fabric first' approach incorporating energy efficiency measures and renewable or low-carbon energy where possible.
  • Policy LPRSP14(C) (Climate Change) sets out a range of measures to ensure that development in the borough mitigates and adapts to climate change.

The policies will encourage sustainable and energy efficient design of buildings within GTTS sites and ensure a proportion of energy used by GTTS residents is from renewable or low-carbon sources.

E.3.12 SA Objective 11 – Biodiversity

E.3.12.1 Table E.3.9 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 11 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.12.2 The DPD and LPR set out a framework of protective policies that will help to ensure that adverse effects on biodiversity designations are identified, avoided, and mitigated and that development proposals strive for a higher 20% BNG requirement than the national minimum. However, there remains potential for adverse effects on ancient woodland, priority habitats, and local wildlife sites (LWS) associated with a small number of reasonable alternative GTTS sites that coincide with these features.

Table E.3.9: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA11 – Biodiversity

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for biodiversity

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Threats and pressures to European sites – Sites 0021 and 0306 are located less than 50m from the North Downs Woodland Special Area of Conservation (SAC), and Site 0235 is located within 400m of Queendown Warren SAC where significant adverse effects are likely. A small number of GTTS sites are located within identified recreational Zones of Influence (ZOI)5 or Nutrient Neutrality Catchment6, where there is potential for adverse effects. The Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening has identified likely significant effects associated with air quality, water quality/quantity, recreational pressure and urbanisation effects at several European sites.

  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure regard is given to the designation and purpose of national ecological designations when granting permission for rural exception sites.
  • DPD Policy TR9 (Dayrooms and Amenity Blocks) requires GTTS proposals to demonstrate integrated ecological enhancements in line with Policy LPRQD1 (Sustainable Design).
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) sets out the highest level of protection for SACs, SPAs and Ramsar sites in line with the Habitats Regulations, including a requirement to demonstrate nutrient neutrality within applicable areas and contribute to recreational mitigation within the 6km ZOI of Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA/Ramsar.

While the LPR policies set out a protective framework for European sites in line with the Habitats Regulations, it is uncertain at this stage whether the potential for adverse effects associated with the GTTS sites will be mitigated, in absence of the HRA conclusions. At the Regulation 19 stage, the HRA Screening will be revisited and a full Appropriate Assessment will be undertaken, which will enable a conclusion to be drawn.

Threats and pressures to SSSIs – two sites (0021 and 0306) lie adjacent to, SSSIs where there is potential for direct adverse effects. A small number of further sites lie within Impact Risk Zones (IRZ) that indicate consultation with Natural England will be required.

  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure regard is given to the designation and purpose of national ecological designations when granting permission for rural exception sites.
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to enhance, extend and connect habitats including designated biodiversity sites.

The policies will be expected to mitigate potential adverse effects on SSSIs at most locations. However, where GTTS development could potentially have adverse effects on SSSIs that underpin European sites (including Sites 0021 and 0306 in close proximity to Wouldham to Detling Escarpment SSSI that underpins the North Downs Woodland SAC), it is uncertain whether impacts can be fully mitigated at this stage, in absence of the HRA conclusions.

Loss or fragmentation of ancient woodland – three GTTS sites (0069, 0084 and 0085) partially coincide with ancient woodland leading to potential direct habitat loss. Several other sites lie in proximity to ancient woodland where air pollution, recreation, and habitat fragmentation impacts are possible.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will ensure that any ecological impacts of GTTS developments are identified and mitigated, including the use of native trees in landscaping schemes, and ensuring 20% BNG in line with Policy LPRSP14(A).
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to enhance, extend and connect habitats including ancient woodland.

The policies will be expected to mitigate potential adverse impacts on ancient woodland and deliver a net gain in biodiversity for the majority of sites; however, there remains potential for adverse effects associated with sites that coincide with or are directly adjacent to ancient woodland.

Threats or pressures to LNRs – one site (0235) lies in proximity to an LNR where there is potential for adverse effects such as air pollution and recreation.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will ensure any ecological impacts of GTTS developments are identified and mitigated and ensure 20% BNG in line with Policy LPRSP14(A).
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to enhance, extend and connect habitats including designated biodiversity sites.

The policies will be expected to mitigate potential adverse impacts on LNRs and deliver a net gain in biodiversity for all GTTS sites.

Threats or pressures to LWS and priority habitats – one site (0085) wholly coincides and one site (0069) partially coincides, with LWS (and deciduous woodland priority habitat), leading to potential direct habitat loss. Two sites wholly coincide with priority habitat (C4S-001 and LPR256). A small number of other sites partially coincide with priority habitats including deciduous woodland and traditional orchard, leading to potential habitat loss or degradation. A number of other sites lie in proximity to LWS where air pollution, recreation and habitat fragmentation impacts are possible.

  • DPD PolicyTR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will ensure any ecological impacts of GTTS developments are 

    identified and mitigated, and ensure 20% BNG in line with Policy LPRSP14(A).

  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to enhance, extend and connect habitats including LWS and priority habitats.

The policies will be expected to mitigate potential adverse impacts on locally designated biodiversity sites and priority habitats and deliver a net gain in biodiversity for the majority of sites; however, mitigation is unlikely to be possible for the two sites that coincide with LWS and include more than 50% of the site area as priority habitat.

E.3.13 SA Objective 12 – Cultural heritage

E.3.13.1 Table E.3.10 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 12 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.13.2 No adverse effects have been identified in terms of Scheduled Monuments (SM), as none of the proposed reasonable alternative sites are located in areas likely to fall within the setting of SMs. However, some GTTS sites lie in proximity to other designated or non- designated heritage assets where there is potential for adverse effects on their setting or character. It is considered likely that any such impacts can be adequately addressed via the DPD and LPR policies. Nevertheless, it is recommended that Council heritage officers, archaeological advisors and/or Historic England are consulted to confirm any potential for adverse effects beyond those identified in the SA, or any requirement for heritage impact assessments to determine need for site-specific mitigation.

Table E.3.10: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA12 – Cultural heritage

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for landscape

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Impacts on listed buildings – a small proportion of GTTS sites have potential to alter the setting of Grade I, II* or II Listed Buildings.
  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure regard is given to the designation and purpose of national heritage designations when granting permission for rural exception sites.
  • Policy LPRSP14(B) (The Historic Environment) supports the conservation and enhancement of heritage assets and their settings.
The DPD and LPR policies are expected to ensure that designated heritage assets including listed buildings and their settings are conserved and enhanced in line with their significance.

Impacts on conservation areas – a small number of GTTS sites are located within, or in proximity to, Conservation Areas where new development could potentially alter the character or historic setting.

  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will ensure that GTTS sites do not cause harm to the historic environment, in accordance with Policy LPRSP14(B).
  • Policy LPRSP14 (B)(The Historic Environment) supports the conservation and enhancement of heritage assets and their settings.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to respond positively to, and where possible enhance, the historic character of the area, and to ensure Conservation Area Appraisals and Management Plans are adhered to.
The DPD and LPR policies are expected to ensure that designated heritage assets including conservation areas and their settings are conserved and enhanced in line with their significance.

Impacts on registered parks and gardens – a small number of GTTS sites are located in proximity to registered parks and gardens (RPGs) where there is potential for new development to alter the setting or views of the RPG.

  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure regard is given to the designation and purpose of national heritage designations when granting permission for rural exception sites.
  • Policy LPRSP14(B) (The Historic Environment) supports the conservation and enhancement of heritage assets and their settings.

The DPD and LPR policies are expected to ensure that designated heritage assets including RPGs and their settings are conserved and enhanced in line with their significance.

Impacts on locally listed buildings – one GTTS site is identified to have a potential adverse effect on the setting of a locally listed building.

  • Policy LPRSP14(B) (The Historic Environment) supports the conservation and enhancement of heritage assets including locally important and distinctive heritage.

The LPR policies afford proportionate protection to non-designated heritage assets, which will be expected to mitigate any significant adverse effects.

Impacts on areas of archaeological potential – a small number of GTTS sites coincide with AAPs where development may damage or undermine the significance of archaeological features.

  • Policy LPRSP14(B) (The Historic Environment) supports the protection, conservation and enhancement of archaeological landscapes appropriate to their significance.

The LPR policies afford proportionate protection to non-designated heritage assets, which will be expected to mitigate any significant adverse effects.

E.3.14 SA Objective 13 – Landscape

E.3.14.1 Table E.3.11 summarises the adverse effects identified in the pre-mitigation assessments for SA Objective 13 and outlines the potential policy mitigation.

E.3.14.2 Overall, the DPD and LPR policies are expected to ensure that significant adverse effects on the landscape are avoided, and that opportunities are sought to deliver GTTS sites of high-quality design that respect their surroundings. However, the DPD should demonstrate that there are no suitable alternatives outside of sensitive landscapes (i.e., the Kent Downs National Landscape) before considering allocating GTTS sites in this area, and ensure that site-specific assessments are carried out to inform any detailed mitigation measures that may be required to protect the special qualities of the National Landscape in line with national policy.

Table E.3.11: Identified adverse effects and policy mitigation for SA13 – Landscape

Identified adverse effect

Policy mitigation for landscape

Commentary: Will the policies mitigate the identified adverse effects?

Impacts on National Landscapes – some 18 reasonable alternative GTTS sites lie within the Kent Downs National Landscape, and a further two sites potentially within its setting, where there is potential for adverse effects on its special qualities and character.

  • DPD Policy TR1 (Spatial Strategy) highlights the need for any windfall development to conserve and enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs National Landscape.
  • DPD Policy TR6 (Rural Exception Sites) will ensure regard is given to the designation and purpose of national landscape designations when granting permission for rural exception sites.
  • Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) sets out requirements for landscaping and boundaries to ensure that GTTS sites are well screened and visual impacts are minimised.
  • Policy LPRSP9 (Development in the Countryside) emphasises that great weight should be given to the conservation and enhancement of the Kent Downs National Landscape and its setting.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to respond positively to, and where possible enhance, the landscape character of the area and to ensure Landscape Character Guidelines and the Kent Downs Management Plan are adhered to.

The policies set out a range of measures to ensure that GTTS development will conserve and, where possible, enhance the character of the National Landscape, including sympathetic design and appropriate landscaping to screen development and minimise visual impacts. While significant adverse effects are likely to be avoided in many locations, there remains potential for localised adverse effects on the character and appearance for sites that lie within the Kent Downs National Landscape, in absence of site-specific landscape evaluations to confirm that mitigation will be effective.

Alteration of landscape character – while many GTTS sites are small scale, enclosed, and/or previously developed, approximately half of GTTS sites have potential to be discordant with the surrounding landscape character, as described within the published Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) (2012)7.

  • DPD Policy TR5 (New Public Site Provision) supports the development of high quality, well landscaped public GTTS sites.
  • DPD Policy TR8 (General Site Design and Layout) will ensure GTTS development is designed in accordance with the LCA (2012) and sets out guidance relating to boundary treatments and landscaping to ensure development is in keeping with its surroundings.
  • DPD Policy TR9 (Dayrooms and Amenity Blocks) cross-references to the requirements of Policies LPRQD1 (Sustainable Design) and LPRQD2 (External Lighting) that will ensure integration of green infrastructure and protection of tranquillity.
  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Travellerand Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires GTTS development to avoid harm to the landscape and rural character of the area, including cumulative effects, and promotes landscaping schemes to screen/soften site boundaries.
  • Policy LPRSP15 (Principles of Good Design) sets out a range of criteria for new development including the need to respond positively to, and where possible enhance, the character of the area, incorporating high quality design and natural features.

Potential impacts on landscape character are likely to be mitigated effectively with appropriate design, landscaping and boundary treatments as set out in the DPD and LPR policies, and with reference to adopted landscape guidelines.

Implications for areas of Local Landscape Value approximately half of GTTS sites have potential to compromise or detract from key landscape characteristics of LLVs within which they are situated.

  • Policy LPRHOU8 (Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation) requires GTTS development to avoid harm to the local landscape character and existing landscape features.
  • Policy LPRSP14(A) (Natural Environment) requires development proposals to protect landscape character including Landscapes of Local Value.
  • Policy LPRSP9 (Development in the Countryside) requires the distinctive character of areas of local landscape value to be conserved and enhanced.

The adopted LPR policies will be expected to ensure that areas identified as LLV and the landscape features they contain will be conserved and enhanced alongside new development.

E.4 Post-mitigation assessment

E.4.1 Overview

E.4.1.1 The impact matrix for all reasonable alternative sites post-mitigation is presented in Table E.4.1. These impacts have been identified following consideration of the likely mitigation effects of the emerging DPD policies and adopted LPR policies as discussed in Tables E.3.1 to E.3.11.

Table E.4.1: Impact matrix of all reasonable alternative sites, post-mitigation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Site reference

Housing

Transport & accessibility

Community & crime

Health & wellbeing

Economy

Natural resources

Water

Air quality

Flooding

Climate change

Biodiversity

Cultural heritage

Landscape

0077

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0079

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0080

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0081

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0082

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0083

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0084

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

- -

0

-

0085

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

0

+

+

- -

0

- -

0087

++

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0088 to 0105

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0106

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

- -

0107

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0108

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0111

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0112

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

0

+

+/-

0

0

0113

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0114

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0116

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0125

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

0145

++

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0160 and 0275

+

-

-

-

+

+

- -

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0161

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0167

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0168

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0169

+

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0170

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0172

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0174

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0175

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0176

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0177

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

0178

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0179

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0182

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0184

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0185

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0187

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

-

+

-

0

0

0188

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0190

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0191

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0192

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0198

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0195

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

-

0

0

0196

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0197

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0199

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

0201

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+

-

0

0

0202

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0203

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0204

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0206

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0208

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0209

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0211

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0213

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0214

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0215

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

0

-

+

-

0

-

0216

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

- -

0219

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0220

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0221

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0222

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-

0225

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0226

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0229

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

0230

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0231

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0232

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0233

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0234

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0235

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

- -

0

- -

0236

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0238

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0244

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

-

0245

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

0248

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0249

+

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0250

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0251

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0252

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0253

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

0

+

+/-

0

0

0255

+

-

-

-

+

-

- -

0

-

+

-

0

0

0256

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0261

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0264

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0279

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0280

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0283

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0284

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0286

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0289

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

0290

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0291

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0292

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0293

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0306

+

-

-

-

+

0

-

0

+

+

- -

0

-

0307

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

0308

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0310

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

0321

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-001

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

- -

0

0

C4S-002

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

- -

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-003

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

C4S-004

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-005

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-008

+/-

-

+

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

0

C4S-011

+

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-012

++

-

-

-

+

+

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-015

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

-

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-017

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-019

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

-

0

0

C4S-021

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-022

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

0

C4S-025

++

-

+

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-028

++

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

-

C4S-029

++

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

C4S-030

++

-

-

-

+

+

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

LPR022

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

LPR023

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

LPR032

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

LPR256

+/-

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

- -

0

--

LPRGT1(5)

+

-

-

-

+

-

+/-

0

+

+

+/-

0

0

LPRGT1(10)

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

0

+

+

-

0

-


1 Maidstone Borough Council (2025) Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Plan Regulation 18c Consultation (Preferred Policies and Potential Sites) November 2025

2 Maidstone Borough Council (2024) Adopted Local Plan Review 2021-2038. Available at: https://localplan.maidstone.gov.uk/home/local-plan-review [Date accessed: 26/08/25]

3 Maidstone Borough Council (2024) Adopted Local Plan Review 2021-2038. Available at: https://localplan.maidstone.gov.uk/home/local-plan-review [Date accessed: 26/08/25] 

4 Kent County Council (2025) Kent Minerals and Waste Local Plan 2024-39. Available at: https://www.kent.gov.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0016/200158/Kent-minerals-and-waste-local-plan-2024-to-2039.pdf [Date accessed: 28/08/25]

5 Within 7km ZOI of North Downs Woodlands SAC, or within 6km ZOI of the North Kent Marshes sites (comprising the Thames Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Area (SPA), Thames Estuary and Marshes Ramsar, Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA, Medway Estuary and Marshes Ramsar, the Swale SPA and the Swale Ramsar designations)

6 Within the Stodmarsh SAC, SPA and Ramsar catchment area

7 Jacobs and Maidstone Borough Council (2012) Maidstone Landscape Character Assessment. Available at: https://maidstone.gov.uk/home/primary-services/planning-and-building/heritage-and-landscape/landscape [Date accessed: 27/08/25]

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.
back to top back to top