Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Development Plan Document

Search form responses

Results for Mrs Emma McBride search

New search New search
Form ID: 956
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Form ID: 957
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Form ID: 958
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

No answer given

Form ID: 959
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

No answer given

Form ID: 960
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

No answer given

Form ID: 961
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Strongly disagree with allocating sites. Especially in Bearsted water lane. We live near this area and worry for the safety of residents and the impact on our house prices- Also the area is not suitable for large vehicles - this is a danger.

Form ID: 962
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

POLICY C4S (008) – THE LODGE Strongly disagree - water lane is not fit for purpose, these are country lanes and would pose a danger to life with excess traffic. Also there has been tragic deaths on Thurnham lane, water lane is no different. The village would not cope with the additional traffic. Impacting residents and resident livelihood. This could effect local house prices. Antisocial behaviour concerns. Wildlife impact- more pollution.

Form ID: 963
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Water Lane Caravan Site- strongly disagree to this policy as a local resident.

Form ID: 964
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Strongly disagree to the site of water lane. This would dominate the area and cause major transport issues. Causing huge safety concerns.

Form ID: 965
Respondent: Mrs Emma McBride

Strongly disagree

Water lane is prone to flooding.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.