Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Development Plan Document

Search form responses

Results for Peter Court Associates search

New search New search
Form ID: 304
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Strongly agree

Form ID: 305
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Nothing chosen

The proposed vision and objectives of the DPD are strongly supported. The alternative, namely failing to meet the reasonably forecast needs will result in unauthorised developments taking place across the Borough. This would therefore frustrate members of the gypsy and traveller communities and cause high levels of frustration amongst nearby residents. Land to meet the needs of these communities therefore has to be provided. The Council’s proposed spatial strategy is supported. The needs of the gypsy and traveller communities are spread throughout the Borough and therefore sites need to be provided in appropriate locations.

Form ID: 306
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Strongly agree

As stated above, if needs are not provided for, the result will be uncontrolled use of land by the gypsy and traveller communities.

Form ID: 307
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Nothing chosen

It is agreed that permitted sites be safeguarded. Nevertheless, and as acknowledged in the policy, there may be occasions when alternative uses of the land is justified.

Form ID: 308
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Strongly agree

The details of the site at Shenley Corner were submitted on behalf of my client in response to the Council’s previous Call for Sites back in February 2022. The decision of the Council to now propose it as an allocation is therefore welcomed. Indeed, I look forward on behalf of my client to working closely with the Council in order to deliver this site for its proposed use.

Form ID: 309
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Agree

The details of the site at Shenley Corner were submitted on behalf of my client in response to the Council’s previous Call for Sites back in February 2022. The decision of the Council to now propose it as an allocation is therefore welcomed. Indeed, I look forward on behalf of my client to working closely with the Council in order to deliver this site for its proposed use.

Form ID: 310
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Neither agree nor disagree

No comment.

Form ID: 311
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Neither agree nor disagree

No comment.

Form ID: 312
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Strongly disagree

This policy does not accord with the plan-led approach which forms the basis of planning. The Council instead needs to identify sites as it is now doing

Form ID: 313
Respondent: Peter Court Associates

Agree

The proposed policies provide a helpful starting point for the consideration of development on each site. Nevertheless, site specific details and constraints need to be taken into account.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.