Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Development Plan Document

Nothing chosen

I wish to register my formal objection to the proposed allocation of land on Water Lane, Bearsted/Thurnham, for use as a gypsy and traveller site. While I acknowledge the importance of providing suitable accommodation, I strongly believe that this particular location is wholly inappropriate due to serious concerns relating to safety, infrastructure, environmental impact, and residential amenity. Highway Safety and Access Water Lane is a narrow rural road with limited visibility, minimal passing opportunities, and no capacity for increased traffic. It is already hazardous for vehicles, cyclists, pedestrians, and horse riders. The road has a documented history of serious accidents, including a recent fatal incident, which highlights the inherent dangers of the lane in its current form. Furthermore, the area is prone to flooding, which significantly worsens driving conditions and visibility. Any development that increases traffic, particularly larger or slower-moving vehicles, would pose an unacceptable risk to public safety. Traffic Pressure and Infrastructure Limitations The surrounding road network serving Bearsted and Thurnham is already under strain, particularly during peak commuting hours and school drop-off and pick-up times. Water Lane and its connecting routes are not designed to support additional traffic volumes. Introducing a permanent site would intensify congestion, increase wear on unsuitable roads, and heighten the likelihood of accidents, placing further pressure on an infrastructure that is already inadequate. Impact on the Rural Environment The proposed site sits within open countryside that contributes significantly to the rural character and visual amenity of the area. Development of this nature would result in the loss of countryside character and could involve the removal of hedgerows and green boundaries that support local wildlife. Given the area’s susceptibility to flooding, there are also serious concerns regarding drainage and water management. Increased hardstanding and surface run-off could worsen flood risk both on the site and for neighbouring land and properties. Effect on Local Residents Residents currently enjoy a quiet rural setting. The introduction of a site of this kind would inevitably lead to increased noise, vehicle movements, and activity throughout the day and night. Additional lighting would further disrupt the character of the area, increase light pollution, and potentially affect both residents and wildlife. These impacts would significantly diminish the quality of life for those living nearby. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I believe the proposed allocation of land at Water Lane is unsuitable for a gypsy and traveller site. The combination of highway danger, inadequate infrastructure, environmental sensitivity, and negative impact on residential amenity makes this an inappropriate location. I respectfully request that the planning authority reconsiders this proposal and explores alternative sites that are safer and more sustainable. Thank you for taking the time to consider my objection. I would appreciate confirmation that this representation has been received and that I am kept informed of any future decisions regarding this proposal.