Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Development Plan Document

Search form responses

Results for Heather Stonestreet search

New search New search
Form ID: 1378
Respondent: Heather Stonestreet

Strongly disagree

We are writing to formally object to the proposed allocation under Policy C4S (008) at The Lodge, Water Lane. After reviewing the proposal, we have significant concerns regarding the suitability, safety, and sustainability of the site. Our reasons for objection are outlined below. 1. Inadequate Drainage and Existing Flood Risk Water Lane already suffers from a lack of drainage infrastructure, leading to regular and severe flooding along both Water Lane and The Street/Roundwell. Any further development will likely exacerbate existing flood conditions, increase surface‑water runoff, and place additional strain on already inadequate drainage capacity. 2. Unsuitability of Water Lane for Large Vehicles and Pedestrians Water Lane is a narrow, rural road with no passing points, poor visibility, and no footpaths, making it inherently unsafe for additional traffic—especially large articulated vehicles associated with travelling showpeople. Increased HGV‑type movements would create hazardous conditions for pedestrians and local residents, cause congestion, and heighten risks at junctions with The Street and Roundwell. 3. Harm to the Character and Landscape of the Area The proposed site is located in an area of natural beauty and rural character. At the time of purchasing our property, we were advised that this land would not be built on or used for residential purposes. A high‑intensity, operational travelling showpeople site would cause material harm to the landscape, alter the rural character, and introduce an incompatible land use. 4. Insufficient Utilities and Pressure on Local Infrastructure The area is already experiencing significant strain on water and electricity supplies. Residents of new‑build developments are acutely aware of the limited capacity. Any additional demand on the water main serving The Street will likely reduce supply reliability and increase disruptions for the wider Bearsted community. 5. Poor Suitability of the Site for Travelling Showpeople The proposed location is remote from essential public amenities, with limited public transport and no village bus service. Its proximity to a railway line would further diminish living conditions. The site therefore fails to provide an appropriate or supportive environment for travelling showpeople. 6. Alternative Sites Available Within Maidstone There are numerous empty and under‑utilised properties within Maidstone that could be redeveloped for this purpose, avoiding unnecessary pressure on sensitive rural areas. Conclusion For the reasons outlined above, I strongly oppose Policy C4S (008) – The Lodge, Water Lane, and request that the site be removed from the Local Plan Review.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.